JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 1, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Astrid Xiomara Jaimes Mejia Y Otras

✓
Topic · hard data
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra El Art. 152 (Parcial) Del Decreto-Ley 1355 De 1970, Por El Cual Se Dictan Normas Sobre Policia. Se Corrige La Parte Resolutiva De La Sentencia C-1175 De 2004 Indicando Que La Decision De La Corte Se Refiere Al Decreto 2055 De 1970
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Corregir la parte resolutiva de la Sentencia C-1175 de 2004, indicando que la decision de esta Corte se refiere al Decreto 2055 de 1970. Por lo tanto, en lo sucesivo, dicha parte resolutiva quedara asi:
  2. Declarar INEXEQUIBLES la expresion: "y un representante de la curia Arquidiocesana de Bogota" contenida en el articulo 152 del Codigo Nacional de Policia (Decreto 1355 de 1970, modificado por el articulo 2 del Decreto 2055 de 1970); y la expresion "excepto el representante de la Curia, que sera designado por el arzobispado" contenida en el articulo 153 del Codigo Nacional de Policia (Decreto 1355 de 1970, modificado por el articulo 3 del Decreto 2055 de 1970).
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.